Example academic essay
Example academic essay: The Death Penalty. This essay shows many features that are important commonly appear in essays.
If the death penalty be restored in the UK?
The restoration of this death penalty for serious crimes is a problem of debate in britain due to the rise that is recent violent crime. The reasons, effects and answers to the nagging problems of violent crime throw up a number of complex issues that are further complicated by the way that crime is reported. Newspapers often sensationalise crime so that you can increase circulation and also this makes discussion that is objective difficult. This essay will examine this topic firstly by thinking about the arguments put forward by those who work in favour regarding the death penalty after which by taking a look at the arguments in opposition to the idea.
The main arguments in favour of restoring the death penalty are the ones of deterrence and retribution: the theory is the fact that people will be dissuaded from violent crime that they gave out to others if they know they will face the ultimate punishment and that people should face the same treatment. Statistics show that whenever the death penalty was temporarily withdrawn in Britain between 1965 and 1969 the murder rate increased by 125% (Clark, 2005). However, we need to consider the possibility that other reasons might have result in this rise. Amnesty International (1996) claims that it's impractical to prove that capital punishment is a better deterrent than being given a full life sentence in prison and therefore “evidence….gives no support towards the evidence hypothesis theory.” It appears at the best that the deterrence theory is yet to be proven. The thought of ‘retribution’ is an appealing one: there was a basic appeal in the easy phrase ‘the punishment should fit the crime’. Calder (2003) neatly summarises this argument when he says that killers give up their rights when they kill and that then it shows that we undervalue the right to live if punishments are too lenient. There are various other points too to get the death penalty, one of these brilliant being cost. It really is obviously far cheaper to execute prisoners promply rather than feed and house them for decades on end.
The arguments contrary to the death penalty are mainly ethical within their nature, it sends out the wrong message to the rest of the country that it is basically wrong to kill and that when the state kills. Webber (2005) claims that the death penalty makes people genuinely believe that ‘killing people is morally permissable’. That is an argument that is interesting could you teach children to not hit by hitting them? Wouldn’t this instead show them that hitting was indeed ‘permissable’? There is the fact you could execute innocent people. Innocent people can invariably be released from prison, nevertheless they can never be cut back through the dead. When anyone have already been killed there isn't any possibility of rehabilitation or criminals trying to make up for crimes. With this reason capital punishment has been called ‘the bluntest of blunt instruments’ (Clark, 2005).
In summary, the arguments put forward by individuals who support or are contrary to the death penalty often reflect their deeper principles and beliefs. These beliefs and principles are deeply rooted in life experiences as well as the way individuals are brought up and are unlikely to be about his swayed by clever arguments. It really is interesting that in this national country most people are in favour of the death penalty yet parliament will continue to oppose it. In this situation it can be argued that parliament is at the forefront in upholding human rights and will continue to broadcast the message that is clear killing is always wrong.
You ought to be in a position to note that this essay comes with:
An introduction in three parts:
1. A sentence saying why the subject is interesting and relevant.
2. A sentence (or two) mentioning the issues and issues involved in the topic.
3. An outline associated with the essay.
Main paragraphs with:
1. An interest sentence which provides a main idea/argument which tells us what the whole paragraph is approximately.
2. Evidence from outside sources which support the argument(s) put forward in the sentence that is topic.
3. Some input that is personal the author analysing the points put forward in the topic sentence plus the outside sources.
Summarises the main points and gives an answer into the question.